Ethical Principles of Preparing a Scientific Article by the Author
- Authors are obliged to publish only original articles, use materials of only original research. All borrowings from other sources must be formatted accordingly with the obligatory indication of the author and the original source. Plagiarism in any form, including unformatted citations, as well as appropriation of rights to the results of other people's research, is unacceptable.
- Authors should indicate the contribution of all persons whose work formed the basis of the study. Persons who did not take part in the study should not be indicated as co-authors.
- The authors of the article submitted for publication must be based on the reliable results of the research. The use and publication of knowingly inaccurate data is unacceptable.
- Authors do not submit previously published papers for publication in the journal, as well as papers proposed for publication in other journals.
- The authors attach to the article their personal data (place of work, address of the place of work, position, e-mail), which are allowed for publication in the journal.
- The authors agree that their article will be sent for review (the name of the reviewer is not disclosed) and undertake to cooperate with the editors to improve, shorten or supplement their article in accordance with the comments of the reviewer, as well as to correct these inaccuracies.
- In case of errors or inaccuracies in an article that is under consideration or has already been published, the authors should notify the editorial board of the journal as soon as possible.
Ethical principles of interaction between the author and the editorial board
The Editorial Board is guided in its activities by the provisions (Liability for copyright infringement in Kyrgyzstan is provided for in Article 150 of the Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republic dated April 21, 2014 (Violation of copyright, related rights and rights of patent holders).According to Article 150 of the Criminal Code of the Kyrgyz Republicand
- The editorial board is obliged to:
- 1. Ensure compliance with academic standards, and
- 2. Prevent conflicts of interest between business requirements
- 3. Be ready to publish, if necessary, amendments to the internationally recognized ethical standards of publications for scientific publications. and the principles of intellectual activity. refutations and apologies.
- Articles of a political nature, containing biased and incorrect assessments of other scientific works and other specialists are not accepted for publication.
- When making a decision on the admission of an article to publication, the editorial board evaluates only the content of the article, regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, political and religious views, social origin and citizenship.
- The editorial board of a scientific journal, when deciding on the publication of an article, is guided by: reliability of data; scientific significance and scientific novelty of the presented work.
- In case of detection in the article of elements of copying from other scientific works (plagiarism) or the facts of publication by the authors of the same article in different journals, the editorial board takes measures to find out the reasons for this violation of publication ethics, notifies the authors of this fact and reserves the right to withdraw the article from publication and in the future not to allow their article to be considered.
- The editorial board strictly observes the confidentiality of the submitted articles: it does not use the materials received for publication for transfer to third parties or for personal purposes, without the written consent of the authors.
- The editorial board provides detailed and reasonable answers to all claims of the authors, making every effort to resolve conflict situations.
Ethical principles of the reviewer's work
- All submitted articles are reviewed by at least one reviewer who is one of the leading experts in this scientific field.
- The reviewer is obliged to give an objective and reasoned assessment of the presented research results. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable.
- Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts should not be used by the reviewer for personal purposes.
- A reviewer who, in his opinion, does not have sufficient qualifications to evaluate the manuscript or cannot be objective, should inform the editor about this, with a request to exclude him from the process of reviewing this manuscript.
- The review analyzes the compliance of the submitted article with the requirements of the journal in terms of subject and volume, as well as evaluates the scientific and technical novelty, literacy and comprehensibility of the presentation of the material, the persuasiveness of experimental data, and the representativeness of the bibliography.
- Reviewers should avoid conflicts of interest with respect to the authors of the peer-reviewed article, the research described therein, or the company that funded the research.
- The result of the reviewer's review of the article is a conclusion about the possibility of its publication – in the submitted form, with revision, after fundamental revision (with reconsideration) or about its rejection. This conclusion is approved by the editorial board of the journal.
- Based on the results of external and internal (editorial) review, the author is sent a review of the article indicating the required improvements and the deadlines in which they must be made.